所有教师, whether you are a probationary faculty (assistant professor) on the tenure-track, a tenured faculty (associate or full professor), 教员讲师, 或顾问, undergo regular reviews as part of the faculty evaluation process. 教师 evaluations are also commonly referred to as Retention Tenure and Promotion (RTP) evaluations or reviews. These reviews are completed on the Interfolio online platform. Interfolio is the place where faculty will upload files for review and where faculty committees, 椅子, and administrators will go to complete the reviews and submit reports. You will be given access to Interfolio for your first review.
While there are many similarities, the processes and timelines for faculty evaluation have some important differences for each type of faculty along their career trajectory. It is important that faculty familiarize themselves with the type(s) of reviews they will need to be involved with. In addition to workshops that are provided by the 教务处 and the content on the 教员事务 website, faculty can review information related to faculty evaluation in the collective bargaining agreement and in the faculty handbook.
The 教务处 works with the colleges to oversee the required evaluation process of 讲师教员, Probationary Tenure-Track Instructional and Non-Instructional 教师 (Assistant 教授), Tenured Instructional and Non-Instructional 教师 (Associate and 全职教授), 和顾问学院.
评估类型:
- 定期检查
- 绩效考核
- 射程高程复核
加州大学洛杉矶分校 uses Interfolio for all reviews.
每分类评估
All evaluation review forms are within Interfolio.
Interfolio instructions are provided within each classification.
Lecturer faculty fill a wide variety of important roles at 加州大学洛杉矶分校. Lecturer faculty are primarily assigned to teach classes, 研讨会, and oversee labs and activity courses; however, some lecturer faculty may also provide clinical supervision or supervision of fieldwork. The collective bargaining agreement refers to lecturer faculty as “temporary” faculty and in following suit, the faculty handbook also incorporates that term. Temporary library faculty and counselor faculty also fit in this category and each have their own sections.
Learn more about 教师评价
Assistant professors (both instructional and non-instructional) are considered probationary faculty on the tenure-track with specific timelines for reviews leading up to a review for tenure status. 足彩外围网站, reviews for tenure and promotion to associate professor are done together with one decision for both. Tenure-track faculty are reviewed every year with years 1, 3, and 5 being periodic reviews and years 2, 4, 6是绩效评估. The 6-year performance review is the evaluation for tenure and promotion to associate professor. 图书馆 faculty have a separate section with information tailored just for them.
Learn more about Tenure-Track 教师评价
教师 (both instructional and non-instructional) who received tenure, are still required to be reviewed every five years. That review is a periodic evaluation, except for the time when the associate professor elects to be considered for promotion to full professor. In that case the promotion evaluation is a performance review. 图书馆 faculty have a separate section with information tailored just for them.
Learn more about Tenured 教师评价
图书馆 faculty are non-instructional faculty, and that delineation is provided in the 教师手册 and also in the collective bargaining agreement. Because the University 图书馆 does not have traditional departments, the review calendars are slightly different. The criteria for reviews are slightly different for library faculty and faculty are advised to check the 图书馆 faculty guidance documents for more details.
Although the roles are different, counselor faculty are like lecturer faculty in the review process and undergo annual periodic reviews for the first six years. The 学生健康中心 does not have traditional departments, so the review calendars are slightly different. The criteria for reviews are somewhat different f或顾问 faculty and counselor faculty are advised to check the counselor faculty guidance documents for more details.
Learn more about 辅导员老师